And I even like the Brushes implementation on Aperture much better than Lightroom. In all honesty, agreeing with the fact that the Develop module is really good, I don’t feel the current version of Aperture is behind in any front with Lightroom 4. Just yesterday I was working with Lightroom, since I’ll be producing a photographic project in March as part of a collective that uses this software. All along I’ve suffered the same frustration of lack of visibility of the product roadmap and wondering whether Apple would continue to support it and develop it. I’ve been a user and a certified Aperture Trainer since version 1. Like the rest of us, he doesn’t see Apple making much serious headway in improving Aperture, particularly for power users. He clearly indicated he was shifting his thousands of images back to Lightroom no matter what. Interestingly, I had read a blog of a fellow who was one of the first beta testers (and supporters) of Aperture. So, what is the reluctance now? Are they only focused on Tweeting and social media?Īnd, yes, I agree with you, is there a next version of Aperture coming? I would simple hate to have to go back to Adobe and Lightroom. They “could” make software that would blow the socks of anything now in existence. And the real shame of it all is now Apple/Google have more $$$ and resources than can be imagined. I am just not convinced now either company is focused on their image editing software anymore. And maybe its just a coincidence, but many of my issues are on very recent versions of Aperture/Nik. What disturbs me the most is that I switched to a Mac platform to get away from these sorts of issues. I will say Nik did acknowledge the issue, which is a good first start to any problem.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |